The DUI laws in Rhode Island are considered relatively lax by some measures, compared with other states. And some statistical measures indicate more drunk driving incidents and alcohol related accidents.
As reported in the Providence Journal, the local Chapter of MADD is hoping to require mandatory ignition interlock devices for convicted drunk drivers, even for a first offense conviction.
An ignition interlock device is a breathalyzer device attached to the ignition of the car, allowing the vehicle to start only if it detects no alcohol on the breath of the driver. Current RI DUI law allows judges to impose an ignition interlock device, but does not mandate it.
First offense requirements for these devices are controversial. Critics argue that this mandate is a harsh reaction to a single incident. Many states like Illinois and Arizona have recently adopted interlock requirements on any first offense drunk driving conviction. Other states like Florida only mandate a 1st offense interlock in high BAC cases (over .15%, or nearly twice the limit), where the driver was seriously impaired. Massachusetts requires them only for 2nd offense DUI convictions.
Also noted in the article is a mention of increased DUI roadblocks being sought. Roadblocks, or sobriety checkpoints, are also controversial, as to whether they are truly an effective use of police resources to stop and prevent drunk driving, as opposed to regular patrols looking for active dangerous and potentially impaired drivers.
Everyone is against drunk driving, but there are honest differences about the most effective means to prevent drunk driving incidents.
